There are quite a few differences. Blood and Plunder uses cards to determine activation, and it is more of an "army" game. I would still call it a skirmish game, but this is a warband game, in the vein of Necromunda and Mordheim.
1. Activation System - uses cards rather (B&P) than rolloff (PR)
2. Dice system - Uses d10 based on army models (B&P), as opposed to the 3d10 system (PR)
3. Number of Models - 20+ (B&P) versus ~10 (PR)
4. Board size - 3x3,4x4 (B&P) versus 2x2(PR)
They are similar enough to make it easy to switch between them, but different enough to be completely different games.
Yowza, that's a lotta keywords!
How is it different from Blood and Plunder?
There are quite a few differences. Blood and Plunder uses cards to determine activation, and it is more of an "army" game. I would still call it a skirmish game, but this is a warband game, in the vein of Necromunda and Mordheim.
1. Activation System - uses cards rather (B&P) than rolloff (PR)
2. Dice system - Uses d10 based on army models (B&P), as opposed to the 3d10 system (PR)
3. Number of Models - 20+ (B&P) versus ~10 (PR)
4. Board size - 3x3,4x4 (B&P) versus 2x2(PR)
They are similar enough to make it easy to switch between them, but different enough to be completely different games.
They both have tons of keywords.
Super intrigued by the scenario generator, how does that work? Like you roll for objectives, and setup/map or something?
Yes, so you roll for
1. Scenario Variations (Sweltering Heat, Delayed, Stockpile, etc)
2. Deployment (Clash, Ambush, etc)
Huh very cool! Gives me ideas for my own rules...